These drugs are treated as Penalty Group 2 under Texas drug laws. On the other hand, Valium, Ritalin and other prescription drugs come in the Penalty Group 3 category and have more serious consequences for lower amounts of possession like 200 grams and are highly fined (Provine, 2007)
These include: job rotation, job enlargement, job enlargement, job Enrichment increases, flextime and job sharing (Methods and Techniques for Motivating Employees, 2012). Other things that can be done include sending handwritten notes, making work fun, helping employees connect, reward effort as well as success, giving out free passes and stroke their passion (Tynan, n
The board is independent of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, but the two work closely, with the latter carrying out such responsibilities as supervising parolees, determining their release, and housing convicted felons (Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 2011). A Brief History of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles The Texas legislature, in 1929, did away with the "two-member board of patron advisors, which had existed since 1893, and established a three-person body to advise the governor on clemency matters" (Lucko, 2010)
In deciding whether or not to grant parole to an offender, the board makes use of a case summary provided by the parole commissioners. Some of the information captured in the case summary includes, but is not limited to, descriptions of the offender's; Current offence: the weight of the specific offence that put the offender in prison, together with the amount of time already served (Topek, 2014)
Working for the board therefore implies having to deal with misunderstandings brought about by differences in views, values, and beliefs. The Public's Negativity: with the high levels of recidivism reported annually, the public has lost confidence in the parole board for what it considers failure to enact effective parole release and eligibility conditions (Worsham, 2014)
According to Bado (2013), both the assurance, as well as security for a citizen's right to be tried fairly are enshrined in our constitution's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. In the words of the author, "the two provisions must be read together in order to provide the full extent of the due process rights afforded those in a criminal trial" (Bado, 2013, p
S. Department of Justice Statistics, one of the most common crimes for which people were convicted by the end of the year 2012 had to with illegal drugs (Carson, 2014)
According to Levin in Alvarez (as cited in Cyndi, 2009), Latinos are not only thought by most to be lazy, but also sneaky and thieving. For this reason, "law enforcement practices and the criminal justice system have been shown to collaborate in discrimination against Latinos in the form of police harassment of Mexican-Americans" (Cyndi, 2009, p
These, most times, are mere stereotypes that have their basis on misconceptions. Stereotyping is so severe with regard to Latinos that they unfortunately "suffer from an aggregation of negative stereotypes experienced by both African-Americans and Asian-Americans" (Delgado and Stefancic, 2000, p
Negros and whites), were also protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. More specifically, the court found that "the Fourteenth Amendment is not directed solely against discrimination due to a two-class theory' -- that is, based upon differences between 'white' and Negro" (Garc'a, 2009, p
" In that regard, therefore, the trial of Hernandez could not be deemed as having been fair as long as a specific group of people, which happened to belong to the accuser's descent, had deliberately been excluded from the membership of the jury. Most importantly, this reasserted that minorities were beneficiaries of the traditional equal protection rights that discouraged any kind of the said minorities underrepresentation on jury venices, provided such underrepresentation was deemed to be substantial (Olivas, 2006)
Overview In basic terms, the Hernandez case "involved the exclusion of Mexican-Americans from serving as jurors, which, like voting, is a primary duty and privilege of U.S. citizenship" (Soltero, 2009, p
Advances in public health such as immunizations, safer and healthier food, improved sanitation, and clean water have helped people live longer, healthier lives. Just think, in 1900, the life expectancy was 47 years old and today that expectancy is up to 77 years old -- and counting (Sanchez)
Life Expectancy in Texas Over the years: life expectancy in Texas While we never actually know how long our lives might be, there are ways to calculate our life expectancy. According to Wikipedia, life expectancy is defined as the projected number of years of life left at a given age (Sullivan and Sheffrin)
This was the reason so many ethnic Mexicans had been living in what became the United States at the outset, making the admittance of Mexicans into land that had formerly been theirs a highly politically charged proposition for both Mexico and the United States. In addition, the people of Texas felt that the legislation that allowed for the Bracero Program was too restrictive; proud and fiercely defensive of their independence -- which had been won relatively recently from Mexico and which had been given up to join the United States even more recently -- Texans opted to continue their "open border" program that allowed for unregulated illegal immigration (Koestler 2010)
Braceros and their families were often treated as second-class citizens or worse, with the agreements they signed often not lived up to by the farmers and other employers, and with permission to leave and return to their homes in Mexico dependent on emergency situations and a boss's willingness to sign off on the request (Campesino 2009). Illegal immigrants fared little better, and an entire class of Mexican immigrant workers and their families emerged in many states, including a sizable population in Texas (Renteria 2003)
Racial Tensions One of the reasons that the Bracero Program was implemented was due to the already widespread hiring of illegal immigrants in the agricultural industry. This legalization of an already-existing practice was meant to help regulate the number and location of immigrants in the country, and in many ways contributed to the racial discrimination that already played a major part in the relationship between many farmers and the immigrant workers they hired (Zatz 1993)
Although several civil rights groups petitioned the court stating that "it is impossible to transmit the virus which causes AIDS by spitting," a number of medical experts specializing in HIV testified that it could. (Weeks v. State, 1992) These experts stated that while the chances of doing so were somewhat low, it was possible and there were documented cases where the HIV virus was transmitted through saliva
Slavery in Texas Randolph Campbell, in his book "An Empire for Slavery: The Peculiar Institution in Texas," said that "protecting slavery was not he primary cause of the Texas Revolution, but it certainly was a major result." (Campbell, 1989, pp
This problem is not only unique to the State of Texas. It happens in more than 39 states in the United States (Cohen, 2012)