Social Sustainability Sources for your Essay

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Many other nations simply store the waste in ceramics, and avoid reprocessing, but just aim for finding safe disposal sites. This approach is less sophisticated, but it also reflects that not every country with nuclear power utilizes the most up-to-date disposal practices (Lee, et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Many other nations simply store the waste in ceramics, and avoid reprocessing, but just aim for finding safe disposal sites. This approach is less sophisticated, but it also reflects that not every country with nuclear power utilizes the most up-to-date disposal practices (Lee, et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


American perceptions of climate change have followed this somewhat predictable trend. Public support for policies to deal with climate change "will be greatly influenced by public perceptions of the risks and dangers posed by climate change" (Leiserowitz, 2005)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


The literature review essentially gathers the information without any interpretation or discussion. It is only in the methodology phase when then research is examined, analyzed, and the similarities and differences between the findings are subject to analysis and discussion (Lewis and Ritchie, 2003)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Expert knowledge and thorough research are critical because of the inherent need for rigor in qualitative research, the field having essentially shifted away from quantitative concepts such as reliability and validity.The concept of rigor should include thoroughness in research, the development of expert-level knowledge of a subject, and the application of unbiased analysis of the information that is available (Morse et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


In order to restore growth to the industry, and the promise of atomic energy in general, the issues that have befallen nuclear power in recent years will need to be better understood. Nuclear Power and Climate Change There are only five energy generation methods that are capable of providing baseload electricity while meeting the greenhouse gas emissions guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and Generation III nuclear fission is among them (Nicholson, Beigler & Brook, 2011)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


These views are somewhat conditional, especially when nuclear power is framed as a means of mitigating climate change. Faced with that argument, the British public was found to be slightly more willing to accept nuclear power, though the authors note that most respondents did not have a sophisticated understanding of the risk-risk analysis on which to base their opinions (Pidgeon, Lorenzoni & Poortinga, 2008)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Politicians and civilians alike are not risk-neutral, but risk-averse. India, as a nuclear power has sought to manage the safety of nuclear energy by reprocessing to recover plutonium and unused uranium, effectively diverting this waste for other purposes (Raj, Prasad & Bansal, 2006)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Thus, while is alarming that so many different issues have arisen from Fukushima, that disaster also provides science with many more opportunities to learn about the risks associated with nuclear power, something that should improve policy-making going forward. Another emerging issue is the use of photocatalytic processes to degrade and mineralize materials under CV-radiation (Rekab et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


This could mean that people are less willing to accept nuclear power if they can see the cooling towers, which would put the perception of risk towards a more immediate perception. It has also been found that higher levels of citizen participation in determining energy policy will bring about lower levels of resistance, many citizens in particular want to understand how a proposed project will benefit their community (Rogers et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


The International Atomic Energy Association has set out basic guidelines for the handling of nuclear waste, but individual nations also have their own regulations (IAEA, 2009). Risk-based regulation is common, but can be challenging to implement with respect to nuclear waste because while overall probabilities are very low, the negative outcomes are very high should they occur (Rothstein et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Today, nuclear energy provides for roughly 10% of the world's energy needs. There are reactors in 31 countries, for a total of 427 reactors as of 2013 (Schneider et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Today, nuclear energy provides for roughly 10% of the world's energy needs. There are reactors in 31 countries, for a total of 427 reactors as of 2013 (Schneider et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


There is in fact little voluntary work done to mitigate the effects of climate change. Awareness of climate change is high, but it is unusual for people to directly take action to address climate change, 43% of people reduced energy usage at home and 39% reduced gasoline consumption in response to concerns about climate change (Semenza, et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


One proxy is to substitute voter action for voter intent, though in the real world those two things can diverge significantly. While experts have been able to predict voter intentions quite well (Singh et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


The two most common types of meta-analytic approaches that are commonly used in researches are Study Effect Meta-Analysis and Classic or Glassian Meta-Analysis. Study Effect Meta-Analysis differs from the other approach on the premise that it has more selective inclusion rules and the study act as the unit of analysis (Shachar, 2008)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


These factors have not only influenced public perceptions and attitudes but also affected policy development relating to the development and growth of nuclear power. Social dimensions relating to the growth of nuclear power have largely been centered on public opinions about nuclear power that have been shaped by accidents that have taken place in the nuclear power industry such as the Chernobyl incident and Fukushima accident (Sovacool, n

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


The research needs to be able to effectively manage information; the organization of the literature review along the individual research questions was instrumental in developing the needed organization to answer these questions. There also needs to be systemic competencies such as research capabilities, the ability to apply knowledge, the ability to adapt to one's set of circumstances and creativity (Verd, 2010)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


This will also help easy selection of the final set of studies that meet the previously mentioned inclusion criteria. The use of various approaches in deciding which articles to use in meta-analysis is primarily because the qualitative paradigm of this process views truths as multiple unlike classic meta-analytic accounts which only allows the inclusion of controlled, randomized studies (Walsh & Downe, 2004, p

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


The carbon output of nuclear power, especially when the life cycle approach is taken, is not insignificant, and there are unknown variables (Fthenakis & Kim, 2007). In the UK, people have become more accepting of wind power, but that aesthetics, and not a logical analysis of energy policy alternatives, is the driver of public perceptions about wind power (Warren et al