Police Misconduct Sources for your Essay

Police Misconduct Case Study the District Attorney


346) in 1966 that has required police to advise suspects of their constitutional right to remain silent before they initiate custodial interrogation (Schmalleger, 2009). The penalty for violating this requirement is that the evidence produced improperly may not be introduced at trial (Dershowitz, 2002)

Police Misconduct Case Study the District Attorney


Typically, such means included prolonged interrogation lasting many hours (or even days) without food or water or access to restroom facilities, and without the opportunity to contact legal counsel (Freidman, 2005; Zalman, 2008). It was not particularly uncommon for police to beat confessions out of suspects if they believed they "knew" were guilty of serious crimes (Friedman, 2005)

Police Misconduct Case Study the District Attorney


S. 346) in 1966 that has required police to advise suspects of their constitutional right to remain silent before they initiate custodial interrogation (Schmalleger, 2009)

Police Misconduct Case Study the District Attorney


The Fifth Amendment Issue The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right against self-incrimination (Zalman, 2008)

Police Misconduct in Suspect Arrest and Ruling Procedure


S. Supreme Court in matters relating to unethical Police decisions or immoral practices by the police (Baker & Thomas R