52). This restriction on free expression is the reason that whistleblower Edward Snowden remains on the run from the federal government for divulging national secrets (Munger, 2015)
51-52, 1919) wherein Justice Holmes explained, "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic." At the time, Justice Holmes also emphasized that each free expression case must be viewed in terms of whether free expression crosses the line to endanger the public interest: "The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent" (Schenck v. United States, 1919, p