Russian Sources for your Essay

Russian Literature and Vladimir Sorokin:


(Matthews) of significant interest is a quote from Sorokin in the Washington Post in which he calls literature a narcotic. (Hoffman, 2002) in that article, Sorokin goes on to say that without literature we cannot survive, as without art in general

Russian Literature and Vladimir Sorokin:


The question most Russians will argue, then, is: "How far back should the pendulum swing?" (Wilson, 2005) "Our future is becoming our past," the well-known novelist Vladimir Sorokin told Michael Kimmelman of the New York Times. (Kimmelman, 2007)

Russian Literature and Vladimir Sorokin:


Indeed, many people view such Russian literature as an exploration of Soviet and post- Soviet life through the prism of the psychology of "totalitarian" political culture. (Matthews) The reader is then introduced to another boy, Seryozha, who reminds the old man of some unidentified contract that seems to refer to the attempt with Oleg

Russian Literature and Vladimir Sorokin:


25-26) Interestingly, according to Birgit Menzel, Sorokin's novels are parodies of post-Soviet political occult ideologies. (Menzel, 2007, p

Russian Literature and Vladimir Sorokin:


According to one criticism of Sorokin, Four Stout Hearts is specifically pointed to as horrific by Russia. (Rogal) The criticism goes on to state that Four Stout Hearts is "grotesque and repulsive" and that Sorokin's Russian audience finds the novel blasphemous

Russian Literature and Vladimir Sorokin:


The excerpt begins with a boy, Oleg, bread and an old man, Genrikh Ivanych or "Staube," who tells Oleg a story of impoverishment. (Sorokin, 1991, pp

Russian Literature and Vladimir Sorokin:


The excerpt begins with a boy, Oleg, bread and an old man, Genrikh Ivanych or "Staube," who tells Oleg a story of impoverishment. (Sorokin, 1991, pp

Russian Literature and Vladimir Sorokin:


( Zarakhovich, 2002) Opponents to censorship have accused the conservatives with being dictators ("This stinks of Comrade Stalin," Sorokin has said) and with having their priorities wrong. (Wilson, 2005) "If the deputy cared as much about Russia's true children… Russia could be a paradise" one liberal reporter has printed

Effects of Collectivization on the Russian Countryside


Since koolacks constituted between 4 and 5% of the population, this decision doomed more than one million families to loss of their property and to banishment from their lands." (Hindus 63) The reasons for the focus on the successful farmers were expected to accomplish a couple of things

Russian Revolution From Leninism to Stalinism


This is where Stalin stepped in. Stalin believed that rapid industrialization and collectivization of agriculture would transform Russia into a rich and strong socialist state (Chung, 2004)

Russian Revolution From Leninism to Stalinism


Stalin's leadership resulted in the massive killing of Russians through the aid of the secret police and slave labor camps known as gulags. One of Lenin's biggest projects was designed to improve Russia;s economy (Keep, 1976)

Russian Revolution in 1917 Poor


Seeing the eventual consequences of smaller fighting groups or army, The Russian army rejoined to fight Galacia despite losing over a million fighters, and to their relief, they managed to defeat the Austrians. What followed was a mere disaster as significant sides of the Russian empire were receiving fighting from their enemies (Bunyan, and Fisher 471)

Russian Revolution in 1917 Poor


The large number of poverty-stricken employees who ended up working for long durations in exchange for meager compensations coupled by their slam dwelling status further fueled the worsening situations. The poor conditions touched the renown Karl Marx and he ended up in describing the peasants as only supposed to lose the chains and nothing else (Kowalski 32)

Russian Revolution in 1917 Poor


First Russian Revolution in 1917 The first Russian revolution abruptly happened in the February of 1917 and to many people it was the expected and it saw the overthrowing of the Russian monarchy. As a badly plotted event, it otherwise resulted from a number of successful successive happenings before, during, and after 1917 (Levine 51)

Russian Revolution in 1917 Poor


Petersburg and did not consider what the citizens thought about the country.3 there were thus both domestic and foreign impact that would shape the world history (Wade 1)

Russian Revolution in 1917 Poor


At this moment, Nicholas was facing extreme pressure on his leadership and thus, he renounced his sovereign power where his brother took over power. Unfortunately, Michael failed to acknowledge the authority as he (Nicholas' brother) failed to accept the challenge from his brother as he opted for election to power by Duma and due to his stand on the matter, the following day saw his resignation leaving Russia without a national leader (Wood 59)

Slavophilic Russian Ideas vs. The


They saw the abolition of serfdom 'from above' as a necessary prerequisite so that peasants could own their own communities. However, they had no desire to abolish the autocracy but merely to rid it of its authoritarian element which, they felt, left no space for the spiritual development of the people (Duffy, 2006)

Slavophilic Russian Ideas vs. The


As a result, large multinationals must compete with one another for both global markets and substantial and diverse productive capacity. This similarly encourages modest investment in Russia, a market of 150 million, even in the face of continuing economic difficulties and political uncertainty (Saunders, 105)

Russian Revolution Sheila Fitzptrick Author\'s Writing Style


In most of the accounts given, conclusion is the fall of the Russian provisional government in 1917 or an end of Russian Civil War in 1922. As compared to these facts, the author highlights that the revolution in Russia did not end until the end of the five-year plan in the year of 1932 (Fitzpatrick 45)

Russian-u.S. Relations Surrounding Syria Today


Gilpin has acknowledged the non-government organizations and transactional forces impose strong impacts on the international system. According to these philosophers, these impacts stem from the world environment, which has been dominated by one state (Dunne, 2007, p