Social Sustainability Sources for your Essay

Professional Growth in Environmental and Social Sustainability


social sciences, humanities, and sciences. University education provides numerous opportunities for growth given the diverse nature of this discipline and its emergence as a relatively new profession (Gloudeman, 2014)

Professional Growth in Environmental and Social Sustainability


Businesses in the modern world are increasingly focusing on sustainability strategies because of the intersection between people, profits, and the planet. Practitioners in this field are rarely confined to a specific area of expertise since draw upon varying disciplines to develop solutions that meet social, economic, and environmental needs (Knowles, 2014)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Nuclear power decisions are made most often at the political level, as a matter of national energy policy, rather than the scientific level. In terms of the science, there is little doubt that nuclear power can be used, albeit with some fairly significant risks (Alic, 2012)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Moreover, the suitability of meta-analysis technique for this research is attributed to the fact that it's a collection of methodical techniques for resolving obvious contradictions in research findings. This technique also involves translating results from varying studies to a universal metric and statistically examining relation between research characteristics and findings (Bangert-Drowns & Rudner, 1991)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


7% by 2020, as that energy will be replaced by carbon. The current trend of decreasing nuclear capability, therefore, is a blow to efforts to mitigate climate change and for the affected countries to meet their carbon emissions reduction guidelines going forward (Bauer, Brecha & Luderer, 2012)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


In particular, the fear of climate change is growing, and at a rate faster than the fear of nuclear energy. While public perception of nuclear power is not especially safe at the moment, it may be that in the near future the fear of climate change is greater than the fear of nuclear energy, and at that point there may be a shift in public sentiment with respect to nuclear energy (Bickerstaff et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Where nuclear power is concerned, disasters do shape opinions, but disasters not relating to nuclear energy can similarly be leveraged as an opportunity to reshape public opinion with respect to nuclear power. Disruptive emergencies can shift the fate of both politicians and public policies, because of the profound impact that emergencies have on the public (Boin, Hart & McConnell, 2009)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Indeed, there is a link between physical vulnerability and willingness to accept alternatives to carbon. It has been found that the more people become physically vulnerable to the effects of climate change, the more they are willing to accept other alternatives, even alternatives that they had previously considered palatable (Brody, et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Hypothesis #4: Nuclear energy is not viewed as a viable solution to climate change The results of each study's rating will be demonstrated in a standardized format to enable comparison of the selected articles. Moreover, the use of these strategies is part of using statistical procedures in meta-analytic review to integrate research findings from various studies and express results through numerical effect-size projections (Bushman & Wells, 2001, p

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Faced with that argument, the British public was found to be slightly more willing to accept nuclear power, though the authors note that most respondents did not have a sophisticated understanding of the risk-risk analysis on which to base their opinions (Pidgeon, Lorenzoni & Poortinga, 2008). There are very few Britons who unconditionally accept nuclear power as a means of mitigating climate change and carbon emissions, and attitudes do not appear to be shifting particularly quickly, based on surveys conducted over the years (Corner, et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Notably, this study will be conducted through meta-analysis technique, which is a suitable research methodology for the issue under examination because it promotes a more objective evaluation of evidence or selected studies in a manner that is more effective than conventional literature or narrative reviews. Meta-analysis is basically a statistical procedure that integrates findings of several independent studies that are considered as combinable (Egger, Smith & Phillips, 1997, p

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Underground repository conditions are a critical success factor for nuclear waste disposal, and there is significant work being done still to determine the best conditions, given corrosion and other variables. Archaeological artefacts can inform researchers about the best methods of storing waste long-term, and predictive models are still a work in progress (Feron, Crusset & Gras, 2008)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Another consideration within this subject is that there is carbon emissions associated with nuclear power, something that is often ignored when nuclear power is presented as a climate change mitigator. The carbon output of nuclear power, especially when the life cycle approach is taken, is not insignificant, and there are unknown variables (Fthenakis & Kim, 2007)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


GREEN GOOD TO GO Chapter Three Research Traditions There are a number of different research traditions that could be used to understand a subject as broad as nuclear power. Generally, the wide nature of this issue implies that the research methodology utilized, measurements undertaken, and the kinds of people examined differ depending on the study while the topic is the same (Glass, 1977, p

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


GREEN GOOD TO GO Chapter Three Research Traditions There are a number of different research traditions that could be used to understand a subject as broad as nuclear power. Generally, the wide nature of this issue implies that the research methodology utilized, measurements undertaken, and the kinds of people examined differ depending on the study while the topic is the same (Glass, 1977, p

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Whatever the excuse, psychological barriers may be, colloquially known as "dragons of inaction" limit the ability of the public to change perceptions with respect to climate change. It's either the public lacks the scientific literacy to understand the issue, they cling to ideological worldviews that prevent them from accepting reality or they fear change because that's what people do (Gifford, 2011)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Actinides are recycled back into fuel, and the Indian government has a program to research the "long-term evaluation of vitrified waste product under simulated repository conditions" (Raj, Prasad & Bansal, 2006). Vitrification is a process that is commonly used for immobilizing high level nuclear waste by "combining it with borosilicate base glass" (Hand et al

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


And there might not be any applicability to Russia, Iran or other country that essentially has no tradition of democracy and whose cultural roots are dramatically different from those in Anglo-traditional countries. The optimal technique for the research questions at hand is known as research synthesis, which is the qualitative equivalent of meta-analysis (Jefferies, 1999)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


The need for change, therefore, is the main driver of the change. In the shock doctrine, politicians have an agenda ready, waiting for the shock so that they can implement it (Klein, 2007)

Social Sustainability Through Nuclear Energy and Waste Disposal


Many other nations simply store the waste in ceramics, and avoid reprocessing, but just aim for finding safe disposal sites. This approach is less sophisticated, but it also reflects that not every country with nuclear power utilizes the most up-to-date disposal practices (Lee, et al