Yet, this view often spurs the misconception that the Democrats are essentially failing to provide the success they had previously promised voters. Here, the Republican voice suggests that "a Democratic majority in the Senate has led our country in the wrong direction -- to unprecedented budget deficits, an exploding national debt and rising gas prices, while failing to address the tragedy of never-ending unemployment and declining housing values," (Brock et al
Rogerian Argument Against Bipartisan Squabbling "Our Founding Fathers intended no parties when they created this institution," yet the current political environment is plagued by bipartisan squabbles and discontent (Dingell 2011)
Yet there is lack of knowledge about this vaccine among majority of parents and some concerns are related to sexual health problems that in their views will emerge as a result of vaccine uptake. It was noted that there is a need to raise awareness about HPV and Gardasil vaccine among general public without attaching it to the cervical cancer (Brabin, Roberts, Farzaneh, & Kitchener, 3087)
There is a synonymy in describing risk related to HPV infection to the communication related to sexual activity and risk related to it among adolescents. Therefore the opposition to mandatory vaccination programs is not surprising (Brown, Little, & Leydon, 224)
An opposing view of this issue is presented by viewing the history of cervical screening. Since the introduction of Pap smears nearly 50 years ago as screening for cervical cancer, the United States rates of cases of cervical cancer and resulting deaths lessened by more than 75% (Castle, 367)
S. Food and Drug Administration licensed in June 2006, prevent infection from four human papillomavirus (HPV) types, two of which case cervical cancer (Cox, Cox, Sturm, & Zimet, 29)
A study conducted in Scotland in 2008 evaluated a cohort of girls eligible for school-based vaccination to determine side effects of the vaccine and the impact on vaccine completion, as well as reasons for non-vaccination. The majority of reasons for non-vaccinaiton were due to non-acceptance and perceived lack of need for the vaccine, and perceived lack of evidence of safety of the vaccine (Ebhohimheh, Hue, Tissington, Oates, & Stark, 2010) These sentiments were echoed to a degree by a study performed in England in 2005, which accessed the approval of parents and the possible uptake of HPV vaccine uptake within eight secondary schools before the certification of the HPV vaccine in said country
It has been stated by experts that vaccines will work effectively if every ones uptakes them; the law of herd immunity states that the possibility of abolition of a disease can be anticipated if majority of the people use vaccine against a certain virus. By giving vaccination to the children before the age of their sexual activation will help to radically reduce the occurrence of as a minimum some damage for the next generation (Gibbs, 2006)
Another view of this issue explains that organized HPV vaccination combined with screening could potentially prevent most cervical cancer. Vaccinations alone will not prevent cervical cancer unless their efficacy is longer than 15-year; if the duration of efficacy is shorter and efficient boostering is not organized, the onset of the cancer in women is merely postponed (Harper, 594)
Burka and Yuen (2008) also believe that procrastination is a problematic behavior that emerges as a response to stress or anxiety. They address the issue from the standpoint that procrastination is a behavior to which anyone and everyone is susceptible, including students, scientists, administrators, assistants, executives, doctors, teachers, parents, salesmen, and all other persons and professionals (Burka & Yuen 2008)
In this essay, the purpose is to acknowledge the different ways in which procrastination occurs in the lives of people and identify and explain the most probable cause of procrastination as a coping mechanism in human behavior that can have both positive and adverse affects. Most probable cause of procrastination Most psychologists believe that procrastination is a coping mechanism in response to anxiety that stems from the anticipation of starting or having to finish/finalize either an important task or an important decision (Fiore 2006)
Without getting too much into the psychology of human choice and behavior, it is just important to note that procrastination is no different than most other human behaviors in that it can result from conscious intention, subconscious intent, or some combination of the two. According to Schraw, Pinard, and Wadkins (2007), three conditions exist as part of a behavioral response to make that behavior labeled as procrastination, listed as follows: Counterproductive: Problematic, thwarting achievement of a purpose; tending to hinder or distract from one's higher priorities or purpose (Simpson & Weiner 1989)
Therefore Facebook should have high levels of easy to use choice on the part of the consumer, as to what he or she is willing to share and with who and should also have a low level of tolerance for illegal and bad behavior on the part of users all while protecting this functional and useful new social tool. (McCafferty) (Kayri1 & Cak-r) (Kodrich & Laituri) (Carroll & Landry) Argument in Favor of Greater Controls or Elimination of Facebook Facebook can and often does create conflict in interpersonal relationships through inappropriate behaviors of its users
(McCafferty) Conversely others argue that the potential for violations of privacy and inappropriate (or illegal) activities make SNS an insurmountable threat to individuals that should be tightly controlled if not stopped all together. (Kugler) (Haughton & Joinson) (Chaulk & Jones) The reality is that with the advent of almost any new technology there are both positive and negative possible outcomes, and in the case of social networking sites the potential of each can be exponential
(McCafferty 19)They serve as a source of information for individuals and groups as well as a source of relative connectivity between individuals who know one another in the real world and to allow connections between people who share common interests but might not know one another outside a SNS. (Houghton & Joinson 75) The interconnectivity of the sites, in this paper the focus will be on Facebook the most popular of the SNS service, can serve as a foundational support network for information and to build and/or maintain social connections, yet it also has the potential to leave individuals vulnerable to fraudulent and bad behaviors by others as well as a public arena for the exposition of one's own bad behaviors
Therefore Facebook should have high levels of easy to use choice on the part of the consumer, as to what he or she is willing to share and with who and should also have a low level of tolerance for illegal and bad behavior on the part of users all while protecting this functional and useful new social tool. (McCafferty) (Kayri1 & Cak-r) (Kodrich & Laituri) (Carroll & Landry) Argument in Favor of Greater Controls or Elimination of Facebook Facebook can and often does create conflict in interpersonal relationships through inappropriate behaviors of its users
(McCafferty) Conversely others argue that the potential for violations of privacy and inappropriate (or illegal) activities make SNS an insurmountable threat to individuals that should be tightly controlled if not stopped all together. (Kugler) (Haughton & Joinson) (Chaulk & Jones) The reality is that with the advent of almost any new technology there are both positive and negative possible outcomes, and in the case of social networking sites the potential of each can be exponential
Rogerian Argument Facebook Rogerian Argument about Facebook Social networking sites (SNS) are a rapidly growing segment of social interaction all over the world. (McCafferty 19)They serve as a source of information for individuals and groups as well as a source of relative connectivity between individuals who know one another in the real world and to allow connections between people who share common interests but might not know one another outside a SNS
(Houghton & Joinson 75) In this context the validity of stricter controls and even the elimination of some more unsecure features or even the site itself seem plausible as like many other forms of technology the potential for human harm is great. (Strand 11) (Ryan & Xenos) Additionally, the standard idea that the consumer is ultimately responsible for self-protection seems to be lacking in this instance as so much becomes out of control in a web of infinite connectivity
With respect to animal rights there is a middle ground that can be acceptable to both opponents and proponents of animal testing. This middle ground is not extreme; rather, it would force animal testing companies to engage in "humane reform" (Regan, 688)