Pay Equity Sources for your Essay

Philosophizing Compensation Pay Equity Refers


Different employees will be compensated differently depending on the level of education, training, ability, experience and skill. Highly skilled people are paid better salaries especially if they contribute greatly to the organization and without their input the company might not be even in business if not make good profits (Garvey 2005, 76)

Philosophizing Compensation Pay Equity Refers


This will shield the company from departmental demands for specific compensation practices usually based on the performance or profitability of the department. However customizations of the plan are sometimes necessary so as to meet the objectives of the department for instance a sales motivations (Nwachukwu 1996, 37)

Campaign for Pay Equity


The fourth reason that states that women retire with less than half their savings in their pension accounts as compared to men is true. This is because research indicates that they usually end up with $8,000 in their superannuation accounts as compared to the $31,000 that men end up with (Kelly,2006)

Pay Equity


Male labors would not tolerate the allowance of cheap labor into their areas of employment; and employers, irrespective of the fact of employment of women in any level were totally opposed to paying increased wages. (Beaton, 1982) However, in the years ever since inception of World War II, the amount of women in the workforce has enhanced persistently

Pay Equity


Irrespective of the fact that more and more female are entering the top executive ranks in America they are to confront a considerable barrier: a wide wage disparity at the first sight in the Corporate America. (Edmonds, 1999) 1

Pay Equity


(Maine Federation of Business & Professional Women) The Wartime economy spread full employment and in doing so, attained what the New Deal programs failed to perform. (Khalid, 2004) America necessitated workers and supplies

Labor Law Pay Equity and Age Discrimination


Benko was found to be "too temporally and situationally distant from the actual hiring decision to be seen as strong evidence of the employer's practice or attitude," the court ultimately decided that "the plaintiff could not convince a reasonable juror that this evidence proved that age was a substantial factor in the decision made by Mr. Johnson not to promote the plaintiff" (Munley, 2007)