Such people certainly need treatment and help, and not free aid to continue supporting their habits. In this respect, then, terminating welfare benefits for those who fail drug tests may actually serve as an incentive to get them the proper medical assistance they need (Berggoetz and Cook, 2014), instead of facilitating the resources for them to continue abusing drugs
Of the many reasons why it is vital to implement drug testing for welfare recipients, the most eminent is due to the fact that mandating this requisite will greatly reduce the incidence of individuals squandering their welfare benefits on drugs. One of the foremost concerns of welfare dissidents is that hardworking Americans should not see their money go to people who would rather buy drugs than simply get a job (Grovum, 2014)
The point of creating these programs was not to permit individuals to merely utilize these benefits for all of their lives -- to have entire families that use them and create more families who are all on welfare. Such a situation is detrimental to children, whom some in favor of drug testing for welfare recipients are trying to protect (Robles, 2013)
There are a number of reasons why this statement is true, primarily because there are several places of employment that issue drug testing for its employees. Florida's governor is attempting to effect drug testing for state employees (Saunders, 2014)
S. Supreme Courts to emanate from the Constitution despite the fact that there is actually no direct reference to any right of privacy in that document (Dershowitz, 2002)
These policies and procedures are often justified as necessary to ensure a safe, drug-free learning environment." (Yamaguchi, Johnston, and O'Malley, 2003) in 1995 a precedent was set in the case of Vernonia School District v
7% of those who engaged in past month binge alcohol use. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006) II
Findings in this study include those as follows: 80% (42) high schools with SDT programs in 2002-03 scored higher than the state average on the state-mandated graduation test (grades 10-12); statistically significant number of high schools (37 or 71%) with SDT programs in 2002-03 had graduation rates higher than the state average; Number of expulsions and suspensions were due to drugs, alcohol and weapons for SDT high schools showed a 30% reduction in schools with testing programs. (McKinney, 2004) Other findings in the study conducted in 52 Indiana high schools include the following as stated in the work of McKinney (2004): Marijuana use - statistically significant decreases in marijuana use in 2003 with a SDT program over 2001 without a SDT program; Compared to 2001, students felt safer in 2003 when asked 'In past month, how often has a student missed school because he/she felt unsafe on school property? All grades (9,10,11,and 12) stated they "felt much safer" in 2003 as compared to 2001
On this accord, random employee drug testing is considered as a degrading, persistent practice that functions against the long-term American ideals of due process and assumption of innocence. (Armentano, n
Drug tests might infringe present and eventual employee's right to privacy and if a popular body of writing is to be believed, might badly impact their attitude towards work and behaviors. (Comer, 1994) Chris Argyris supported a type of organization in which managers would give scope in favor of employee satisfaction of need and creative expression
This program was aided by the development and modification of cost effective, smart methods to identify a spectrum of drugs found in a single specimen of urine sample that led to apprehension in the military that pervasive drug use would come in the way of functional preparedness and security. (Coombs; West, 1991) An identical apprehension among the U
A staff cannot, nevertheless, carry out random drug testing in a manner that intervenes with the rights of employees under Section 8(a) (3) or 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act. (Ford; Notestine; Hill, 2000) References Armentano, Paul
Moreover, public sector as well as private sector employees are subject to the provisions of civil rights. (Klingner; O'eill, 1991) In the last few years, there has been proliferation of workplace drug testing, especially urinalysis
For instance, novel testing methods to treating addictions are being shaped and these might have insinuations for the manner in which organizations structure and make use of drug testing programs. (Murphy; Saal, 1990) The Random Drug Test is seemingly the most contentious of all drug tests
Employers have a prerogative of choosing the method of random drug testing if they feel it is necessary, but supporters of privacy rightly advocate that random drug testing is a violation of an employee's right to privacy. (Sofsian, 2008) Drug testing constitutes an insidious method that might result in an applicant being dismissed from the job who is otherwise accomplishing his duties to the satisfaction of his superiors
Nigeria alleges Pfizer did not obtain the required approval for tests, nor did it get proper consents from patients. Pfizer countered by saying the alleged victims were affected by meningitis and not the drug, and that Trovan saved many lives (Oboh, p
However, it was later revealed that there was no Nigerian ethics board. In addition, the samples were not tested correctly, resulting in study results so tainted that the results wee not accepted (Spar, p
Pfizer wanted to test its use against meningitis, and in Africa there was an epidemic of it. Meningitis is rare in the United States, so researchers came to Kano to test it against the dying (Stephens, p
It helps identify the source of support for randomized drug testing, Protestant conservatism. "Conservative Protestants, compared to liberal-moderate Protestants, Catholics, and those with no affiliation, display higher levels of normative-based support for random drug testing" (Blackwell & Grasmick, 1997) It also shows the context surrounding the support by providing the reader with information concerning how people with religious ideals view drugs
Random drug-testing as seen in previous articles have led to suspensions and communication between law enforcement. The Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees that no state shall "deprive an individual of life, liberty, or property without due process of law" (Cambron-McCabe, 2009), allows for students procedural due process before they can be expelled or suspended