Affirmative Action Sources for your Essay

Affirmative Action Programs Have Been


Affirmative Action Programs at Work Discrimination in employment or recruitment practices is discouraged for obvious reasons. By and large affirmative action programs seek to remove limitations on career aspirations, expand people's "sense" of what they can achieve and subject all people to the "full range of options to the kind of individualized scrutiny that is appropriate to career decisions and goals" (Stroud, 1999: 3)

Changing Affirmative Action Laws the Need to


" When the law was enacted, employers were suddenly forced to hire people based on characteristics that were not to be discriminated against, so they could make quotas and appear as though they were not discriminating against anyone (Dontigney, 2013). That led to social upset and confusion, and led to company owners becoming angry with the way they were forced to hire people who might not have been the best for the job but who met other criteria that were required (Crawford, 1992)

Changing Affirmative Action Laws the Need to


Social isolation was common in the sense that people kept to their "groups." When the law was enacted, employers were suddenly forced to hire people based on characteristics that were not to be discriminated against, so they could make quotas and appear as though they were not discriminating against anyone (Dontigney, 2013)

Changing Affirmative Action Laws the Need to


In other words, there was less mixing of social classes, races, and ethnicities (Who, 2013; Rosado, 1997). Sexual orientation was kept very private, and most people did not talk about discrimination issues (Rosado, 1997)

Changing Affirmative Action Laws the Need to


That can come through getting a job because they are a member of a protected class, or being overlooked for a job because they are not a member of a protected class. In either instance, affirmative action comes into play and affects the people who can be hired for specific jobs (Wood, 1998)

Affirmative Action Is an Organization of Policies


Directly or indirectly, Affirmative Action does not inherently helping the poor in the society. The poor have continued to live in poor health, poor education, and poor governance due to being sidelined by the Affirmative Action at the prospect of giving them equality with those superior to them (Moultry, 1999)

Affirmative Action Is an Organization of Policies


The society has equally suffered as it has gained from Affirmative action. Nonetheless, much debate is yet to come over the issue since its issues seem to take another fifty years for them to be settled and resolved in the human society (Rabe, 2001)

Affirmative Action Is an Organization of Policies


According to President John F. Kennedy, Affirmative Action is as good as a society that respects the ordeals and structures that build up this society (Spielberger, 2004)

Positive and Negative Effects of Affirmative Action


These arguments include the negative impacts on non-minorities as well as the negative impact on minorities. The primary argument is that affirmative action leads to reverse discrimination, an argument that has merit since affirmative action permits employers to use race as a primary hiring qualification (Messerli, 2012)

Affirmative Action in Hiring Affrimative


An environment that is diverse is one that embraces a variety of various cultures and ethnic backgrounds, different races, genders, and some would argue that age is a component of diversity. However, does a lack of diversity effect the efficient operation of the company? If it does not, as some will agree, then why is diversity important? One argument is that diversity promotes a suitable environment or culture for employees (Berman, Bowman, West, and Van Wart, 2006)

Affirmative Action in Hiring Affrimative


S. District Judge Samuel Conti, upheld the state of California's Proposition 209 which bars racial, ethnic, and gender preferences in public education, employment, and contracting (Chea 2010)

Affirmative Action in Hiring Affrimative


District Judge Samuel Conti, upheld the state of California's Proposition 209 which bars racial, ethnic, and gender preferences in public education, employment, and contracting (Chea 2010). Before Judge Conti upheld Proposition 209, the Supreme Court of California had upheld Proposition 209 in August 2010 (Elias, 2010)

Affirmative Action in Hiring Affrimative


This report discusses thoroughly the history of affirmative action and arguments for and against its implementation in the employment hiring process. Overview Affirmative action is defined as taking positive steps to increase the representation in areas of employment, education, and business in areas in which they have been traditionally excluded (Fullinwider)

Affirmative Action in Hiring Affrimative


While cases on affirmative action have come before the Supreme Court numerous times since the Bakke, the Supreme Court has ultimately failed to overturn its decision, and as such affirmative action remains legal on a national level. While this is true on a national level, many states such as California, Michigan, Nebraska, and Washington state have banned affirmative action (Kirkland 2010)

Affirmative Action in Hiring Affrimative


Constitution that declares that any federal law-trumps any conflicting state law. (Linder, 2010)

Affirmative Action in Hiring Affrimative


Still, in light of the Supreme Court's ruling challenges on affirmative action are more frequent than before and these challenges have resulted in several states banning affirmative action, in spite of the Supreme Court decision. In 2008, five states -- Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, and Oklahoma -- voted to ban affirmative action in government funded projects and public schools (Lindy, 2008)

Affirmative Action in Hiring Affrimative


In 2008, five states -- Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, and Oklahoma -- voted to ban affirmative action in government funded projects and public schools (Lindy, 2008). On November 7, 2006, the state of Michigan voted to ban affirmative action in the selection process in public universities (O'Connor, 2007)

Discrimination and Affirmative Action Glass Ceiling


Even though women hold managerial positions, few have made breakthroughs to top level positions.' (Adair, 1994)

Discrimination and Affirmative Action Glass Ceiling


'The glass ceiling barrier towards women is nothing but an insidious form of sex discrimination, in violation of law.' (Ann, 1994) And while company managers increasingly recognize the value of workforce diversity, particularly at the management levels, glass ceiling barriers continue to deny women the opportunity to compete for and hold executive level positions

End Racial Preferences? Affirmative Action Was an


Nor is it because they are more committed to fairness and absolute colorblindness than Anglos elsewhere. It happened here, quite simply, because minorities were fast approaching 50% of the population and whites felt that the playing field had tilted against them" (Rodriguez, 2010)