However, efforts to deal with the security threats should be administered in accordance with universal justice and the protection of basic and constitutional individual rights. Retribution is the moral justification of punishment as compared to advocating that the society embraces impractical morality (Bradley, 2012)
One of the most significant events that have contributed to the current revolutionary change is the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Nonetheless, the main factors underlying the change include the new global power balance, the rapid technological advances, and changing attitudes regarding the use of armed force in Western societies (Donnelly, 2003)
The other important aspect of security and justice efforts should be informed by and situated within a general normative and institutional context in which the eventual aim is the promotion of a rule of law system over governance. In the past few years, justice and security are treated with simple sub-components of a development strategy together with basic social services like health and education (Harborne & Sage, 2010)
It is crucial that such offenders be treated in a particular way that favors the recovery of their mental incapability to discern right and wrong. Consequently, devising a criteria or protocol, which is even in all situations is mandatory thus, the core objective in this research (Braswell, McCarthy & McCarthy, 2011)
However, it is imperative to note that such circumstance can be used as a getaway for some offenders if a case is not well investigated. Insanity defense has been used in the past in courts to defend people who do not take responsibility of their violent acts (Elliot, 1996)
Hence, it is imperative that the judicial system and criminal justice should step up to confront this matter. Establishing programs in favor of mentally ill prisoners and offender can be a reliable means of containing this matter (Fay, 2002)
It has been a substantial challenge to the jury and judges to determine the final sentence of such people without favoring the offender or neglecting the pain of the victim. A closer look at the picture reveals two distinct sides, which both call for immediate attention to researchers and analysts to determine the line between guilty and innocent in the cases of mentally disturbed offenders (Hartwell, 2004)
Nonetheless, these people have long been denied such opportunities and ended up in jail with other normal people. The worst happens when they engage in dangerous and violent fights with prison mates that lead to fatal accidents and occurrences (Jaffe, 2011)
Such individuals are often under internal pressure to act in a given manner, but without rational thinking. Unfortunately, the judicial systems have not considered the emotional disturbance in such people, and judge them without empathy (Moore, 2009)
The quantitative study is meant to reveal patterns of judicial proceedings which will lead to conclusions and potential outcomes, which will lay strong evidence e to support the thesis. A survey research is done to determine the position and opinion of the people about the conviction of mentally disturbed people (Babbie, 2012)
This would mean that unless the justice administration is able to prove its worth with its people, there would be no real respect for the system. (Folgelson, 1974) However, a fresh new idealistic candidate, newly armed with a degree in the administration of justice would be able to demonstrate his or her knowledge of contemporary policing and security, and be able to recognize distinguish those management factors that are considered to be important and vital to the efforts that are related to activities such as policing
Main Findings by Aviram and Seymour In their article, (2011) report that in the United States, there are two models of crime control being debated in the United States today: (a) the Crime Control Model and (b) the Due Process Model. While the Crime Control Model places higher priority on providing an efficient criminal justice system through the early determination of guilt by law enforcement authorities, the Due Process Model emphasizes the preservation of accuracy in the criminal justice process and the avoidance of convicting the innocent (Aviram & Seymour, 2010)
court magistrate or justice hears the case in closed chambers and without a jury trial. This compares with 37% of juveniles of all races and backgrounds adjudicated delinquent were committed to a correctional facility on average for 34 months (Scalia, 1997, p
However, the two bodies are functionally related. Both of them are mandated to collect intelligence information from the public and help the users make informed decisions relating to the national security (Kraft & Marks, 2012)
The freedom of the two bodies is paramount in ensuring that they achieve their expected mandates. No amount of control can be justifiable without ensuring that the two operate independently yet objectively (Shapiro, 2011)
The administration of justice is the process by which the legal system of a government is executed. The presumed goal of such administration is to provide justice for ...
Students who searched for what can you do with a degree in administration of justice found the following resources, articles, links, and information helpful.
The legal definition of Administration of Justice is The personnel, activity and structure of the justice system - courts and police - in the detection, investigation ...
The administration of justice is the process and structure which allows conflicts between parties to be settled by a body dedicated to that purpose. Every thing ...
Administration of Justice Degrees Associate Degree for Transfer (ADT) Administration of Justice for Transfer A.S. Degree (PDF) Associate in Arts (A.A.) Degree